7.2°C Mostly Cloudy 
1
The Federal Liberals unveiled a proposal this week that would reign in the power of the Prime Minister to prorogue Parliament, less than a week after the NDP announced a similar plan of their own.
Parliament was set to resume on Jan. 25, 2010 but due to the prorogation will now open on Mar. 3, 2010.
“Our plan is to bring back much of the legislation that was previously tabled and when we do I hope that the other parties do not dilute the legislation with amendments like they have in the past,” says Stockwell Day, MP for Okanagan-Coquihalla.
Both of the proposals seek to limit the power of the Prime Minister from proroguing for longer than one month or within one year of the last suspension of Parliament or when he's facing a confidence vote, unless a majority in the House of Commons consents.
The proposals would also require the Prime Minister to give at least 10 days written notice of his intention to prorogue, spelling out his specific reasons for doing so, and allow a full debate on the matter in the Commons.
They would also allow parliamentary committees to continue to function while Parliament is suspended.
This measure derives from the opposition conviction that Harper's latest prorogation was designed to silence a special committee looking into the Afghan detainee controversy.
The government has maintained that it needs the time in order to consult with constituents on the economy.
“Prorogation is a relatively customary process, now with the Olympics and re-organizing our fiscal plan we felt we needed the time,” says Day.
“If they want this time to consult with Canadians they should resume Parliament on schedule and consult with the MP's who are elected and paid to make representation on behalf of their constituents to the government,” stated Alex Atamenko, an NDP MP for BC Southern Interior.
Atamenko says that the whole idea of what Stephen Harper has done is wrong and that there has to be measures taken in order to ensure Parliamentary accountability.
MOST DISCUSSED STORIES
MOST READ LOCAL STORIES
Day says prorogation customary
![[Get Copyright Permissions]](http://license.icopyright.net/images/icopy-w.gif){kind=small}
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2010 Glacier Media Inc.
Comments
Sort Comments:
saawat says...
sorry meant to say the olympics were held in Canada before...
saawat says...
“Prorogation is a relatively customary process, now with the Olympics and re-organizing our fiscal plan we felt we needed the time”
The elections were held in Canada before: 1976 Montreal - no prorogue and 1988 Calgary -no prorogue. Surely Day is not suggesting thet his government is more incompetent than Pierre Trudeau's or Brian Mulroney's?
Post a comment
You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.
Merritt News welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.
This is the same hocus pocus these folks have been pushing across the country. This is only the fourth time the prorogation has been used in such a partisan manner and Harper has committed two of these four evils. Never before has a PMO used the prorogue in a minority situation to avoid scrutiny of its' work. Canadian's aren't apathetic and we definitely aren't stupid. We know a rogue prorogue when we see one.
But, what is more troubling is the fact that this government seems to believe that it is all powerful and unstoppable. Canadians should also be concerned that these politicians are misappropriating their tax dollars to build their empire. Or, pretty soon we will all be singing Oh Harper in steady of Oh Canada!
Posted on January 30, 2010 @ 4:40 pm PST | Report post to Editor | 3173974